You Can't Have It Both Ways
The US has the right to enforce its borders. Nobody is disputing that. What is being disputed is the quality of the machinery doing the enforcement.
I'm not good at self-promotion. I'm terrible at it, actually. I watch people build personal brands — LinkedIn posts, Twitter threads, conference talks — and I genuinely don't understand how they do it without wanting to crawl out of their own skin. There are people who dominate rooms just by existing in them. I'm the one standing near the exit, thinking of something I'll wish I'd said three hours later.
I don't know where this comes from. Failure, probably. Enough of it that visibility started feeling dangerous. There's something in me that resists being known — not in a mysterious, romantic way, but in a broken way. The kind that makes simple things like updating a bio feel impossible.
And yet. I have opinions. Strong ones. Ones that keep me up at night, ones that I've stress-tested against history and philosophy and my own inconsistencies. I want those opinions to exist in public. I just don't want me to exist in public alongside them.
So here we are. A blog with no face. A name — Gab — and nothing else. The arguments are the whole thing. If they're good, they don't need my face. If they're bad, my face wouldn't help.
Come on. Life isn't A or B. What makes humanity remarkable is that we create paths that didn't exist before we imagined them. Every meaningful advance in civilization — every abolished injustice, every new right, every institution worth preserving — was built by someone who refused the choices they were given and invented a new one.
The Wright brothers weren't choosing between faster horses and faster ships. Mandela wasn't choosing between accepting apartheid and armed revolution — he spent 27 years constructing a third option that nobody thought was possible. The entire arc of human progress is the story of people who looked at A and B and said "neither — here's C, and it's better than both."
That's not idealism. That's engineering. You don't accept a broken system and pick your favorite failure mode. You redesign the system. The fact that redesigning is harder than choosing is exactly why most people don't do it — and exactly why the ones who do are the ones who actually change things.
The trolley problem was designed for a philosophy classroom. Using it to justify political decisions is intellectually lazy — and dangerous.
The US has the right to enforce its borders. Nobody is disputing that. What is being disputed is the quality of the machinery doing the enforcement.
The law is a human invention. It can be wise or foolish, just or unjust. Blind obedience isn't virtue — it's the abdication of moral responsibility.